The ethical issues began to be pointed out by Bradey and Longsdon who in their writing guides us through the physiological and physical harm occurred during the prison experiment, including the mental abuses of the prisoners and the guards obsession with sudden authority.In d Krebs (ed. Ethics and the Stanford Prison Experiment by Philipp Zimbardo. ‘It followed the guidelines of the Stanford human subjects ethics committee that approved it.
Throughout the experiment participants were put under physical and psychological harm, which strongly would violate the APA code of ethics. This trend is evident in Stanford experiment among prisoners and gaurds.
They chose to flout prison’s regulations and then later endure repercussions although there were no clear benefits of their actions. All the 24 person were convinced that they have acted under the role and believed that they fulfilled the roles as they were accepted to.
The experimental conditions could have been far much meaner than real conditions of an average prison. No physical violence was permitted.The prisoners, too, couldnât believe that they had responded in the submissive, cowering, dependent way they had. Stanford Prison Experiment and Milgram’s Conclusion Essay.
The psychologists tried to get him toagree to leave the experiment, but hesaid he could not leave because the others had labeled him a bad prisoner.Less than 36 hours into the experiment,Prisoner #8612 began suffering from acute emotional disturbance, disorganized thinking, uncontrollable crying, and rage.Participants playing the role of prisoners were not protected from psychological harm, experiencing incidents of humiliation and distress. p706) From this sense it shall be quickly concluded that prisoners were also under physical harassments, once guards did adopt the negative attitude towards them, their aggression increased. The guards worked in teams of three for eight-hour shifts. With the treatment that the guards were given to the prisoners, the guards would become so deeply absorbed into their role as a guard that they would emotionally, physically and mentally humiliate the prisoners:In 2018, in response to criticism by Le Texier and others, Philip Zimbardo wrote a detailed rebuttal on his website.
Those prisoners who remained in the mock prison began assimilated with their role and accepted humiliation and abusive treatment, as if they deserved it (Bredy, Longson. Only one of the prisoners refused to do that. Here you will also find the best quotations, synonyms and word definitions to make your research paper well-formatted and your essay highly evaluated.The only difference was that in the 21st century, no one justified the behavior of the US guards in Guantamo.