Ellis v. State, 130 Tex.Cr.
Be this as it may, it is apparent from the record that the consent was secured before any contraband was found, and there is an entire absence of any showing that the officers in any way intimidated either the appellant or his wife into giving their consent to the search.The offense is the possession of whiskey and beer in a dry area for the purpose of sale; the punishment, 15 days in jail and a fine of $150.Wesley Dice, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.Appellant presents only three bills of exception by which he attacks the legality of the search because the officers did not have a search warrant.
Appellant, Kristina Padilla, pleaded guilty to Battery as a Class A felony. Padilla v. State Annotate this Case.
By five issues, Padilla asserts that: (1) the State's accomplice-witness testimony lacks corroboration by other evidence that tended to connect him to the murder offense, see TEX.
Padilla filed a notice of appeal on July 9, 1999. T. M. Reid, Abilene, for appellant. November 24, 1954. He enumerates this evidentiary ruling as error.
R. 220, 93 S.W.2d 438, and Wheeless v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. A jury acquitted Davenport, but found Padilla guilty of felony murder *148 while in the commission of aggravated assault and of possessing a weapon during the commission of that crime. Alfredo PADILLA, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. art. No. 273 S.W.2d 889 (1954) John M. PADILLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. MORRISON, Judge.
In Lightfoot v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 256 S.W.2d 845, as in the case at bar, the accused had less beer and more whiskey than provided for by the prima facie evidence statute, and we held the presumption as to the whiskey supported the conviction for the possession of beer and whiskey for the purpose of sale.We find the fruits of the search admissible.Investigator Bowman of the Liquor Control Board testified that he went to the appellant's home at 4:00 p. m. on the day in question, knocked on the door and told appellant's wife that he wanted a bottle of whiskey; that she said, "Just a minute"; that the appellant came to the door and told him to wait just a few minutes, and shortly thereafter Mrs. Padilla returned and delivered him a half-pint of whiskey, for which he paid her two dollars. Decided: July 30, 2003. The case was docketed in this Court on July 20, 2000, and Padilla submitted his appeal for decision on September 11, 2000.Christopher Price was involved in an apparent marijuana sale in the apartment of his girlfriend's aunt when a dispute arose. Silvio Andres PADILLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.