35mm Film, Total 108 Exposures . B&W is better, but if you push too hard, you’ll see a lot of blown out highlights and grain. For context, it was very even lighting around 7 pm, color negative film. With digital that might not be that big of a deal you would think but even if you are able to bump your iso to make a decent exposure, those snaps usually are pretty much lacking any drama. He specialized in combining moody light with interesting subjects. I don’t think I’m ready to begin pushing/pulling during the development process, but I would like to consistently overexpose my shots by 1 or 2 stops. So I tried to focus on the outer areas of the building, for once to get brighter scenes and second to have more contrasty scenes. And the drama is what you would expect from such a place.I don’t have to tell you that this was not very satisfying.
It offers a versatile combination of colour saturation and pleasent grain is well-suited for scanning or enlarging. Note that tags with a space are surrounded by double quotation marks. To preserve the details in the shadows, make sure to meter for medium to darker areas of the image. Pulling is overexposing, while pushing is underexposing. If you are getting paid to take the photo, this is not for you, if not save some money. This film has become a bit of an insider tip with high customer ratings on many internet platforms. With digital that might not be that big of a deal you would think but even if you are able to bump your iso to make a decent exposure, those snaps usually are pretty much lacking any drama. […]Lower numbers represent less sensitivity to light. It sounds like you are talking about a camera that automatically reads the speed of the film? It was taken with a Leica M5 and a super-fast Voigtlander Nokton 35mm f/1.2 that @kehcamera sent us! I heard someone at the lab one day talk about “pushing” but not “pulling.” Now I have an idea of what these terms mean.Hey All! Being a bit of an anti/social person at times I was then rather asking for location hints than for joining a party to explore new venues.Nevertheless, to this day, I like some things about abandoned places, the decay and to see how nature is taking back over. This is not the same as Portra 400 or 800, not bad a little dark, and does not have the same contrast. They all provide the level of quality i am happy with, though I am alarmed at the reduction in choice of film stocks. Then, I am thinking, isn’t that what we are actually supposed to do when taking pictures?!? I’m a beginner at photography who is much more interested in learning more about my FE and B&W film. One Roll - Kodak ColorPlus 200 Review - Dean Engson. This was the first film I bought and shot after picking up my first couple of film cameras from a charity shop.The following five shots are from the Yashica Electro 35 GSN. I guess the stock comes from an era when everyone was using film for their holiday snaps, so it needed to handle a lot of different situations but didn’t need to excel in any single one.As you can see on the images in this post, the canister doesn’t match the box. […]Most common in low light situations the film ISO or speed isn’t fast enough to shoot at box speed or suitable handheld shutter speed.
The images I got took all my post-processing skills I had at the time to fix and prepare images so I could get one or two out of a trip that I was more or less happy with.